As an early pioneer of fake news, foreign-language instructor Michel Thomas grabbed headlines with stories about his alleged wartime exploits. His self-proclaimed feats included helping to liberate Dachau, escaping from three concentration camps (one of which he voluntarily returned to before fleeing again), talking his way out of being executed by Gestapo chieftain Klaus Barbie, and rescuing millions of Nazi membership files from destruction.
In reality, many of his claims were either exaggerated or total fiction. After the Los Angeles Times debunked several of the tales, Thomas began changing his stories to line up with historical records the newspaper found. Here's a look at his biggest whoppers.
Escaping Klaus Barbie? One of the first experts to question Michel Thomas' truthfulness was Allan Ryan, chief Nazi investigator for the U.S. Department of Justice. In 1983, after Barbie was arrested in Bolivia, Thomas spun a wild tale about being interrogated and tortured by Barbie for two hours in 1943, a story he had never previously mentioned to the media. In response, Ryan called a press conference to denounce Thomas' claims. "I find it pretty hard
to put any credibility in what Thomas says," Ryan told reporters. Few paid much heed, but
four years later, after Thomas testified at Barbie's
trial in France and was skewered by the press, prosecutor Pierre Truche told jurors: "With the
exception of Mr. Thomas, all the witnesses are of good
faith." Later, in an Oscar-winning
documentary about Barbie called "Hotel Terminus," Truche called Thomas' story "inconsistent."
Before Barbie, Thomas' claims were rarely challenged by the media. One of the flaws of journalism is that reporters usually don't have time to investigate the claims people make about their pasts. But in 2001, Thomas' publicist asked a Los Angeles Times reporter to do a story on Thomas and his recently released biography. After reading the book (and discovering Thomas
had been sued numerous times for failure to pay
taxes, leases and other debts), the newspaper decided to fact-check a few of his war stories (read the full L.A. Times article here):
- Misrepresenting His Military Status. Thomas claimed he was
an officer in the U.S. Army, despite having no discharge papers or military service ID number. In reality, he was a civilian
employee, and the Los Angeles Times found two sets of National Archives
military documents from 1946 bearing Thomas' signature
over the words "civilian assistant." Rather
than admit exaggerating, Thomas unsuccessfully sued the paper for "implying" he was a civilian employee. (The lawsuit was thrown out of court by a federal
judge and Thomas' appeal was rejected by the U.S. 9th
Circuit Court and the U.S. Supreme Court).
- His Ever-Changing Birthplace. At Klaus Barbie's trial,
Thomas said he was born in
Poland. However, for decades before that, he told reporters he was
born in France -- and different parts of France at that.
- Dachau Flip-Flops. Thomas has changed his Dachau liberation story several times. In his biography, Thomas
falsely claimed he accompanied the first battalion of U.S. troops
when it entered the Dachau concentration camp on the
morning of April 29, 1945. After the L.A. Times proved otherwise (to the point that even Thomas' biographer
admitted the book's account was wrong), Thomas tried to
backtrack by claiming he never said he was with the initial
battalion, only that he arrived at Dachau sometime later
that day. Unfortunately for Thomas, he had repeated his
original tale in a sworn affidavit for his unsuccessful libel
lawsuit against the L.A. Times ("On April 29, 1945, the 3rd battalion of
the 157th Regiment liberated the Dachau concentration
camp," he said. "I accompanied these troops"), as well as in press interviews dating back to 1950. Later, after his
private investigator spoke with the commander of that
battalion, Felix Sparks, and realized Thomas' claim was
bogus, Thomas flip-flopped again, insisting he never said he was
with the 3rd battalion. It's also worth noting that the Dachau photos Thomas submitted as evidence with his libel lawsuit had "May 1945" written on the back, although the camp was liberated April 29. And none showed U.S. troops entering the camp or freeing prisoners.
- Tripped Up By Wartime Records. Thomas claimed he single-handedly discovered and rescued millions of Nazi Party ID cards that were about to be destroyed at a paper mill near Munich in May 1945. But his version of events is contradicted by U.S. military records, 1945 articles in the New York Times and London Express, and an Army journalist's detailed account from that time period. In fact, shortly after the L.A. Times article, Thomas changed his story substantially to align with historical records uncovered by the newspaper. But even his revised version doesn't add up.
Thomas' original tale consisted of three main claims -- that he found
the ID cards on his own and prevented their destruction, that he engineered worldwide press
coverage of the discovery in May 1945, and that the media
spotlight forced his 7th Army superiors to swiftly remove
all the documents from the mill for safekeeping. As explained below, the last two of
those claims are indisputably false, and Thomas had to backtrack on both assertions in the sworn affidavit for his unsuccessful libel lawsuit. His story about finding the ID cards is also full of holes.
Here's what really happened: In May 1945, paper mill
manager Hans Huber went to 7th Army officials and told them
about the ID cards. In response, according to military
records, Counter Intelligence Corps agent Francesco
Quaranta drove to the mill, and returned with some samples.
Although the records make no mention of Thomas, it's conceivable that he accompanied Quaranta, but that's sharply different from Thomas' claim that he learned about
the mill from his scout and made a solo rescue of the files. Also untrue is Thomas' claim that he
leaked word of the ID cards to the press, thereby
goading 7th Army leaders into removing the files
from the mill in May. In reality, there was no press
coverage until October of that year -- and Thomas had nothing to do with it, as he conceded in the sworn affidavit for his libel lawsuit. U.S. military records say the 7th Army "abandoned" the Nazi ID cards, leaving them at the paper mill as the unit moved to
another part of Germany. If not for the persistence of mill manager Huber and
the arrival of Gen. George Patton's 3rd Army in Munich, the documents
might never have been preserved. The NY Times and London Sunday Express make clear that the real hero was Huber, a German who defied Nazi orders to destroy the
files. Army journalist Stefan Heym's 1945 account agrees,
and his lengthy history of the cards dovetails with the
press stories. In other words, every source from that
era -- newspapers, Heym and military records --
contradicts major elements of Thomas' story and
gives credit to Huber for saving the files and alerting American troops to their existence.
Moreover, when Thomas was interviewed by the Los Angeles Times, he couldn't name the town where the mill was located, couldn't describe the building and incorrectly claimed the ID cards specifically mention the Nazi Party, which they don't. (He also couldn't recall the unusual color of the cards.) Although it might seem reasonable to assume Thomas' memory would have gaps decades after the war, his book claims he had a photographic recollection of everything in his life. Indeed, Thomas' biography is loaded with intricate details about other events, but when it comes to one of the most momentous finds of the war, he couldn't accurately describe the scene inside the building or the ID cards whose importance he "immediately understood." Why? The most logical answer is that Thomas never set foot inside the mill. That also explains why he took no photos of this blockbuster discovery, even though it supposedly happened just days after he was snapping pictures at Dachau.
Last but not least, military records show that the ID cards were delivered to the mill several weeks before Thomas was even in the vicinity. So if Huber hadn't disobeyed Nazi orders to destroy the documents, there would have been nothing for Thomas or anyone else to "rescue." Without question, Huber is the person responsible for preserving the files.
Despite all the holes in Thomas' story, his supporters contend it must be true because he kept several items from the paper mill after the war. But there are two simpler explanations for how he got them. One is that he pocketed a few of the samples that CIC agent Quaranta brought back from the mill. Another is that the items came from Hans Huber. As historian Astrid Eckert details in her book "The Struggle for the Files," when Huber reported the documents to Army authorities, "he substantiated his claim by producing three sacks of index cards" from his mill.
- The Houdini of World War II? Elsewhere in his
biography, Thomas portrayed himself as a real-life
Hogan's Hero, able to escape concentration and slave
labor camps repeatedly at will. In one story, after
learning his girlfriend secured his release by granting a
romantic favor to a diplomat, Thomas claimed he
voluntarily returned to imprisonment because he didn't
want to be freed under such circumstances. Another prison-break
tale featured him crawling under a bed when some guards
unexpectedly came into the room where he was hiding on
his way out of camp. In a scene that is
reminiscent of several movie scripts, the guards got
drunk and one passed out on the bed, trapping Thomas
underneath all night. Another story depicts Thomas hiding
in a well, telepathically ordering a dog to stop barking
and go away, lest Thomas be discovered by Nazi pursuers.
- His Criticism of Holocaust Victims. One of Thomas' most outlandish claims was that positive thinking could have saved Holocaust victims from execution. He said if concentration camp prisoners hadn't given up hope and surrendered to the "Siren Song" of death, they could have followed his example of (allegedly) escaping multiple camps. In his biography, Thomas describes fellow inmates slowly “succumbing to their fate. They were gone, as surely as a prisoner on death row is gone long before he reaches the electric chair. Nature seems to provide the condemned man with … a natural anesthetic that floods the conscious mind with an almost euphoric invitation to surrender. … Anyone who accepts the invitation is beyond help. … Death becomes a welcome relief.” Thomas claims he was the only prisoner with enough willpower to ward off this “insidious phenomenon” and escape from not one, not two, but three different concentration/slave labor camps.
- OK, but what about the Silver Star that Thomas received after the L.A. Times article? Not all of Thomas' stories were fabricated, and presumably that was the case for this honor, which praised his work as a French army lieutenant from August to September 1944. That work, however, is unrelated to the claims investigated by the Los Angeles Times. And, as Newsday noted, Thomas' Silver Star was not given for American military service.
L.A.
Times Editor John Carroll's 2004 statement about Michel
Thomas:
"We published a story awhile back,
by a very good and clever reporter named Roy Rivenburg,
about a man who published his autobiography. And, if you
read the [book], you'd be amazed you'd never heard of
this man, because he pretty much single-handedly won
World War II for us. It was a preposterous book, and our
review of it was an investigative review. It debunked
many of the claims in the book and had some fun doing it,
had a few laughs at the author's expense. When you put
yourself out in public and make claims that are
preposterous, and publish a book on it, you're likely to
get a reviewer who will look into that and set the record
straight. I'm very proud of that story. We haven't
retracted a word of it; we don't intend to because it was
true."
Further reading:
Washington Post obituary
Proof of Thomas' civilian status in Army
"I find it pretty hard to put any credibility in what Thomas says."
- Allan Ryan, former director,
U.S. Justice Department Office of Special Investigations
"With the
exception of Mr. Thomas, all the witnesses are of good
faith."
- Prosecutor Pierre Truche,
slamming Thomas' testimony at Klaus Barbie's 1987 trial
|